Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page
Search the Web

The impact of home pitch on County Cricketers

 

Why talk about home pitches?  My simple answer is: “because they’re very important”.  We know that some tracks around the county circuit are helpful to bowlers, others help batsmen, a few help everyone and some don’t help anyone.  Now let’s pretend that we’re actually better cricketers than we are, and we’ve just broken into our chosen county side.  In my mind I’m now a gritty opening batsman at Northants, by the way.  What if my home pitch is a green-top where sides are regularly bowled out for 200?  I’m making my way in the game, but I know that in half of my matches I’m going to really have to struggle for my runs.  Meanwhile, my opening partner from school, a lesser player in the eyes of many, is playing on a pitch from heaven.  He’s scoring heavily, and is being talked up in the press as a future England player.  Back to reality, I’m sure you get the idea.  When we’re evaluating players we need to know as much about them as we can, and the pitch on which they play most of their matches is very important.  Now I’m going to show you how to quantify this.

 

Simply working out runs per wicket for each ground isn’t quite enough, since around half of the innings will have been by one particular team.  If that team has very good batsmen the wicket will seem to be good for batting, and vice-versa if a team is less able.  To counteract this we need to look at how well the same players perform away from the pitch, and use this as a measuring stick. 

 

Let’s use Kent as an example.  If we add up all runs scored by both teams at Canterbury, and divide by the number of wickets taken in these games, we get a batting average for Canterbury.  Now we need to work out how this compares to other grounds, so we look at all of Kent’s away games and add up all the runs scored by both teams in these.  We then work out the batting average for the away games.  Now we have a measure of how well two sets of players perform in our test condition (Canterbury) and also in our control condition (everywhere else).

 

The final step is to divide the home average by the away average, and multiply this by 100.  This gives an easy index number to help us measure one ground against another.  A value of 100 occurs if the home ground is completely neutral for run scoring.  This is illustrated below: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOME

 

 

 

 

AWAY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Opp

Ground

Runs

Wkts

 

Team

Opp

Ground

Runs

Wkts

KEN

MID

Canterbury

228

10

 

DER

KEN

Derby

165

10

KEN

MID

Canterbury

253

6

 

DER

KEN

Derby

260

10

KEN

MID

Canterbury

23

0

 

DER

KEN

Derby

129

5

KEN

LAN

Canterbury

186

10

 

ESS

KEN

Southend

295

10

KEN

LAN

Canterbury

445

10

 

ESS

KEN

Southend

364

10

KEN

LAN

Canterbury

517

10

 

ESS

KEN

Southend

223

10

KEN

LAN

Canterbury

125

2

 

ESS

KEN

Southend

155

8

KEN

DUR

Canterbury

229

10

 

GLA

KEN

Cardiff

166

10

KEN

DUR

Canterbury

495

10

 

GLA

KEN

Cardiff

63

3

KEN

DUR

Canterbury

239

10

 

GLA

KEN

Cardiff

142

3

KEN

NOT

Canterbury

309

10

 

GLA

KEN

Cardiff

212

8

KEN

NOT

Canterbury

283

10

 

GLO

KEN

Bristol

142

10

KEN

NOT

Canterbury

307

5

 

GLO

KEN

Bristol

163

10

KEN

NOT

Canterbury

334

7

 

GLO

KEN

Bristol

456

10

KEN

HAM

Canterbury

391

10

 

GLO

KEN

Bristol

297

10

KEN

HAM

Canterbury

173

10

 

LEI

KEN

Leicester

103

10

KEN

HAM

Canterbury

227

10

 

LEI

KEN

Leicester

120

7

KEN

HAM

Canterbury

153

10

 

NOR

KEN

Northampton

218

10

KEN

WOR

Canterbury

360

10

 

NOR

KEN

Northampton

377

7

KEN

WOR

Canterbury

344

10

 

NOR

KEN

Northampton

391

10

KEN

WOR

Canterbury

333

8

 

SUR

KEN

Oval

342

10

KEN

WOR

Canterbury

270

9

 

SUR

KEN

Oval

86

10

KEN

SOM

Canterbury

342

10

 

SUR

KEN

Oval

226

10

KEN

SOM

Canterbury

86

10

 

WAR

KEN

Birmingham

323

10

KEN

SOM

Canterbury

210

10

 

WAR

KEN

Birmingham

197

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

WAR

KEN

Birmingham

202

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

WAR

KEN

Birmingham

262

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 

6862

217

 

 

 

 

6079

236

 

 

 

 

31.62

 

 

 

 

 

25.76

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CANTERBURY RUNS INDEX

123

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is 1998 data, which shows us that Canterbury was a very good pitch for batsmen that season.  However, there’s a chance that these figures can be skewed by any particularly good or bad innings, the weather or anything else you care to think of.  To make sure we’re getting accurate data we need to calculate these values over a longer time period.  The following figures are based on data from seasons 1998, 1999 and 2000.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team

 

1998

1999

2000

 

AV

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DER

 

74

100

101

 

92

DUR

 

96

90

94

 

93

ESS

 

110

110

88

 

103

GLA

 

75

104

105

 

95

GLO

 

85

102

99

 

95

HAM

 

129

126

98

 

118

KEN

 

123

110

115

 

116

LAN

 

86

112

86

 

95

LEI

 

98

86

95

 

93

MID

 

102

101

110

 

104

NOR

 

121

101

121

 

114

NOT

 

96

77

89

 

87

SOM

 

99

107

132

 

113

SUR

 

107

82

101

 

97

SUS

 

113

102

95

 

103

WAR

 

104

105

104

 

104

WOR

 

79

91

78

 

83

YOR

 

101

102

107

 

103

 

We can see that half of the innings played by Nottinghamshire and Worcestershire players were on pitches that made batting very difficult.  At the other end of the scale Hampshire, Kent, Northants and Somerset played on some of the best batting tracks in the country. 

 

Finally, for what it’s worth, I leave you with a handful of players who have performed well in unfavourable conditions:  Hick (Worcs. – time and again), James (Glamorgan), Morris (Hampshire – bowled very well in batting conditions in both ‘98 and ‘99), Saggers & Headley (Kent) and Brown (Northants).